高级检索

增温与氮输入对兴凯湖水−气界面CO2和CH4通量的影响

Effects of warming and nitrogen input on CO2 and CH4 fluxes at the water-air interface of the Xingkai Lake

  • 摘要: 全球变暖和富营养化已成为湖泊生态系统面临的双重压力,二者可以通过改变水温和营养盐浓度,影响湖泊温室气体排放和碳循环过程。然而,增温与富营养化交互作用对CO2和CH4排放的影响机制仍不十分清楚。2024年8—10月,在黑龙江兴凯湖湖泊湿地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站布设了中尺度模拟实验,模拟21世纪中叶气候变化与湖泊富营养化趋势,探讨了未来不同增温与氮输入水平下浅水湖泊水−气界面CO2和CH4排放通量特征及响应机制。研究结果表明,对照、增温和氮输入组水体溶解氧(DO)、电导率(EC)、盐度(Salt)和pH呈上升趋势,CO2和CH4通量呈下降趋势,环境因子和温室气体通量在不同时间尺度上均差异显著(p<0.05),但同一时间各处理组间差异不显著(p>0.05);增温增加了各处理组的水温(WT)、EC、Salt和pH,但对DO有抑制作用;氮输入抑制了各处理组WT和DO的上升,但对EC、Salt和pH有促进作用;监测期间各处理组CH4排放通量为−14.16~90.53 mmol/(m2·d),CO2排放通量为−2520.12~2218.05 mmol/(m2·d),湖泊水−气界面整体上表现为温室气体的排放源。各处理组CO2和CH4交换过程主要受WT、pH和DO影响,pH与CO2排放通量呈极显著负相关(p<0.01),WT和DO分别与CH4排放通量呈极显著正相关(p<0.01)和极显著负相关(p<0.001)。增温对CO2和CH4没有明显直接影响,但通过提升WT促进了CO2和CH4排放;氮输入对CH4排放具有显著直接促进作用(p<0.05)。增温与氮输入都可以通过提升pH抑制CO2排放。总体上,增温和氮输入的交互作用使得水−气界面CO2和CH4交换更加复杂。本研究增进了对浅水湖泊温室气体排放的认知,为全球变暖背景下富营养化湖泊的治理提供了科学依据。

     

    Abstract: Global warming and eutrophication have become the dual pressures faced by lake ecosystems in recent years. They can affect greenhouse gas emissions and carbon cycling processes by altering water temperature and nutrient concentrations. However, the mechanism by which warming and eutrophication interact to affect CO2 and CH4 emissions remains unclear. This study conducted a mesocosm simulation experiment at the National Field Science Observation and Research Station of the Xingkai Lake Wetland Ecosystem in Heilongjiang from August to October 2024. The experiment simulated the climate change and eutrophication trends of the mid-21st century, aiming to investigate the characteristics and response mechanisms of CO2 and CH4 fluxes at the water-air interface of shallow lakes under different warming and nutrient conditions. The results indicated that in all groups, dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), salinity (Salt), and pH showed an upward trend, while CO2 and CH4 fluxes decreased during the experiment period. Significant differences in environmental factors and greenhouse gas fluxes were observed over time (p<0.05), but no significant differences were found between the treatment groups at the same sampling time (p>0.05). Warming increased the values of water temperature (WT), EC, Salt, and pH, while it suppressed DO concentrations. Nitrogen input decreased the values of WT and DO, but promoted the increases of EC, Salt, and pH. During the study period, CH4 flux ranged from −14.16 to 90.53 mmol/(m2·d), and CO2 flux ranged from −2 520.12 to 2 218.05 mmol/(m2·d). Overall, the lake ecosystem acted as a source of greenhouse gas emissions. The CO2 and CH4 exchange processes at the water-air interface were mainly influenced by WT, pH, and DO. pH was significantly negatively correlated with CO2 flux (p<0.01), while WT and DO showed significantly positive correlations with CH4 flux (p<0.01) and negative correlations with CH4 flux (p<0.001), respectively. Warming did not directly affect CO2 and CH4 fluxes but promoted their emission by increasing WT. Nitrogen input significantly promoted CH4 emissions (p<0.05). Both warming and nitrogen input inhibited CO2 emissions by increasing pH. Overall, the interaction between warming and nitrogen input complicated the CO2 and CH4 exchange at the water-air interface. In conclusion, this study enhances the understanding of greenhouse gas emissions in shallow lakes, and provides scientific support for the management of eutrophic lakes in the context of global warming.

     

/

返回文章
返回